DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:15:21 -0400
Reply-To: Ralph Stuart <rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Ralph Stuart <rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>
Subject: Delahanty Fire Lessons Learned
Comments: To: SAFETY
Thanks to everyone who responded to my e-mail inquiry this morning
about Teflon combustion products. I"ll provide a summary of the
responses in a separate e-mail. Below is an e-mail I sent to the UVM
lab community summarizing some of the lessons learned from the
incident and a report from a local neighborhood e-mail newsletter
about the Fire Department's activities.
I'd like to note that the person who was in the building had just
completed 40 HAZWOPER training with us (in an academic class) this
semester and I'd like to think that her response to the emergency was
partly a result of being well-educated ;)...
- Ralph
As you are likely to have seen in the paper or other media, there was
a fire yesterday in a Geology laboratory in Delehanty Hall. The Fire
Department's summary below is generally accurate. The cause of the
fire appears to have been an electrical malfunction in the equipment
being used.
There are several key lessons to be learned from the incident that
I'd like to highlight for the UVM lab community:
1. There was a person in the building when the fire alarm went off.
She was in a laboratory across the hall, but exited the building
immediately as soon as the alarm (triggered by the sprinkler system)
sounded. This protected not only herself, but fire fighters who would
have been required to rescue her if she had still been in the building.
2. The fire was limited to the laboratory hood in which it started.
This is because the sprinkler system activated in the area of the
hood, but also because of the excellent housekeeping and chemical
storage practices of the workers in this laboratory. There were no
chemicals in the hood other than those involved in the process and
therefore the spread of the fire was not abetted by other chemicals
becoming involved.
3. The workers in the laboratory were able to come to the scene and
provide critical information about the chemicals present in the
laboratory to the fire fighters in command of the incident. This
information was critical in assessing potential hazards present and
allowed the state Hazmat team to develop an effective plan of action
for controlling those hazards. As noted above, excellent housekeeping
in the laboratory limited the spread of the hazard in the sprinkler
water.
We are still evaluating the potential environmental health concerns
associated with the residue of the fire, which is primarily soot in
the lab itself. Sprinkler water damaged several rooms on the first
and second floors of the building, but fortunately, during the first
inspection of the building, most scientific equipment appeared to
have been missed by the water.
Let me know if you have any questions about this.
- Ralph
FIRE ON UVM'S TRINITY CAMPUS
By Michael Wood-Lewis,, support**At_Symbol_Here**frontporchforum.com
Mon, 28 May 2007
This just in from the Fire Marshal...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Second Alarm Fire at UVM Laboratory.
Fourteen firefighters and one Police Officer injured
May 28, 2007
At 0932 AM, the Burlington Fire Department received a radio box alarm
for Delehanty Hall at the University of Vermont, indicating a general
alarm and a sprinkler flow alarm. First arriving units found thick
black smoke coming from a smokestack on the roof of the three story
building. With the Memorial Day holiday, the building was not
occupied at the time of the fire.
Upon reaching the third floor, the crew from Engine Three found a
room fully charged with black smoke, and water flowing under the
door. Crouching low in the smoke-filled hallway, the crew donned
their protective masks and attached a fire hose to the stand pipe in
a nearby stairwell. They opened the door and were met with heavy fire
conditions rolling across the ceiling at them. The fire sprinkler
system had activated and was keeping the fire at bay, but the
ventilation hood above the fire was blocking the sprinkler water from
reaching the seat of the fire even as it worked to vent the toxic gas
out of the building. The water flowing from the sprinkler system had
sapped the available pressure from the stand pipe supplying water to
their hose line. Firefighters had to back out of the fire area until
supplemental water could be pumped into the system by an engine
company through the fire department connection.
With adequate water pressure, the crews were able to gain entry into
the fire room, and extinguish the fire. The firefighters ascertained
that this fire was actually in a chemical laboratory and that several
unknown chemicals had been involved. They evacuated the building and
with assistance from both the UVM and Burlington Police, a cordon was
established to prevent further exposure.
Several firefighters and one University of Vermont Police Officer
were experiencing burning sensations on their skin and in their
eyes. Many of them had knelt in the standing water, and some had
inhaled some of the smoke briefly before donning their air masks. In
all, fourteen firefighters and one UVM Police Officer underwent
gross decontamination at the scene and then transported to Fletcher
Allen Health Care.
Fletcher Allen staff set up their hazmat decontamination station, and
the patients were more thoroughly decontaminated prior to entry into
the emergency department.
The Police Officer and all of the firefighters were evaluated,
treated, and later returned to duty.
Through interviews with UVM staff, fire officials learned that an
unknown quantity of hydrofluoric acid and a very small quantity of
percloric acid were being used to dissolve quartz over time in an un-
manned experiment. Several other chemicals were present in the room,
but were not involved in this process.
The Vermont State Hazmat Team responded to the scene, along with a
decontamination team from the South Burlington Fire Department. The
Hazmat team entered the fire area and determined that the air present
in the area did not contain dangerous gasses. Samples of standing
water on the floor were determined to be ph neutral.
A team from the Burlington Fire MarshalÇs Office entered the area in
protective equipment and determined that the fire was not
suspicious. The exact cause of the fire remains unknown, as much of
the equipment involved was consumed by the fire and that which
survived was contaminated. The last units cleared the scene by 1920
hours.
Damage from the fire was limited to the room of origin, however the
smoke, toxic residue and contaminated water in the building caused
damage estimated at over one million dollars.
Contact:
Thomas Middleton,
Assistant Fire Marshal
Burlington Fire Department
(802)864-5577
---------------------------------------------
Copyright 2007 Front Porch Forum. All rights reserved.
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post