Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:47:42 -0400
Reply-To: William Crouse <CrouseW1**At_Symbol_Here**WYETH.COM>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: William Crouse <CrouseW1**At_Symbol_Here**WYETH.COM>
Subject: Re: Question on pregnancy and acid fumes
Comments: To: "Moderator, List"
Aqua regia does not represent either a reproductive or tertatology hazard to a pregnant woman. It is quite corrosive and represents a pulmonary irritant. Under the Johnson Controls decision of the US Supreme Court, you cannot require pregnant women from working within this location. You should ensure implementation of effective engineering controls to minimize employee exposure to acceptable levels irregardless of reproductive status.
William E. Crouse, MS, CIH, CSP
Director, Environmental Health and Safety
641 Ridge Road
Chazy, NY 12921-2420
>>> List Moderator <ecgrants**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU> 3/31/2009 7:27 PM >>>
Subject: Question on pregnancy and acid fumes
Date: March 31, 2009 5:18:46 PM EDT (CA)
I have a question and I would like some of your input;
We have a couple of pregnant women in our lab, we analyze
petrochemical products with lots of hazardous components to the
development fetus and I think we have safely limited the activities
for these women, but how about acid fumes (aqua-regia)?
El Paso Laboratory Services
8645 Railroad Dr.
El Paso, TX 79904
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post