Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:14:14 -0700
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Subject: Re: Article from Chemical and Engineering - very complete
information about UCLA fatality
Comments: To: "Reinhardt, Peter"
In-Reply-To: <F0F1A8C9AF307A4C92D7A84F3941CF9915BD10EF**At_Symbol_Here**>

Peter and others –

Unfortunately, UCLA and the lab had a CHP which satisfied Cal-OSHA.  The reason that there is little mention in the UCLA discussion of the Lab Standard and related is that UCLA is a good example of the standards weaknesses.


Any yes, it would be great to strengthen 1910.1450 and there are discussions along those lines, but that takes changing an existing OSHA standard.  Not easy.


There are many ideas being discussed and this list is a good forum for the discussion.


So, how would YOU suggest (1) improving the lab standard and (2) getting OSHA to do it?


------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------

The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

7563 CONVOY Ct
(858) 874 5577 (phone, 24/7)
(858) 874 8239 (FAX) m


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Reinhardt, Peter
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:10 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Article from Chemical and Engineering - very complete information about UCLA fatality

Kudos to C&E News for this excellent review and analysis.

I continue to be surprised that there is so little mention of OSHA’s lab standard or Chemical Hygiene Plans, and no mention in this article. UCLA is required by California law to have a Chemical Hygiene Plan, and their internal report (and CalOSHA citation) mentions it. Experts in the article discuss the need for lab-specific risks assessment, policies, procedures and training. The Chemical Hygiene Plan is the tool for all these things. In response to this tragedy I think it would be good if ACS DivCHAS worked to strengthen the use and implementation of laboratory Chemical Hygiene Plans.


P eter A. Reinhardt

D irector, Office of Environmental Health & Safety

Y ale University

1 35 College St., Suite 100

N ew Haven, CT   06510-2411

( 203) 737-2123

p eter.reinhardt**At_Symbol_Here**

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Debbie M. Decker
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:38 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Article from Chemical and Engineering - very complete information about UCLA fatality




Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.