Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:20:50 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Lindsey Kayman <kayman**At_Symbol_Here**UMDNJ.EDU>
Subject: Re: Roof top exhaust fan maintenance Policy

If the hoods are all ganged together helps reduce potential exposure thanks to dilution.
There is also a special hazard if each hood has its own fan and the fans are located in a penthouse with the stacks going through to the roof.  Leakage on the positive pressure side could result in substantial exposures to people working in the penthouse.
Lindsey Kayman, SM, CIH, Assistant Director
335 George Street, suite 2250
New Brunswick, NJ, 08901
phone:  732-235-4192
fax:         732-235-5270
email:  kayman**At_Symbol_Here**
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++

>>> ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM 10/30/2009 12:36 PM >>>
Ideally, if they are maintaining the fans and people are not using the hoods while they are working, there should be no problem.  I'd worry more about deposition of contaminants in the fans and ducts which sometimes occurs.   

But this is only true if the stacks and fans were properly designed and engineered.  Instead, what I see on the roofs of most university science buildings are rain capped exhausts or exhausts that are so low that the emissions will put workers at risk who are on the roof.  Hell, it's even worse than that--often the stuff is going right into the air handling units for the general recirculating system for the building.

If the building was built to the ACGIH Industrial Ventilation standards and to local department of environmental protection standards, those stacks would be tall enough or specially boosted to exhaust only into moving air above the building.  The height of the stacks should not be left to architects (who want no protuberances above the roof line) and engineers (who want to specify as much off the shelf equipment as possible).  Instead, the height should be determine by standards and regulations. 

If the stack heights are proper, the workers on the roof will not be exposed to the emissions.  If they are, maybe a redesign is the way to go.

Monona Rossol

In a message dated 10/30/2009 11:49:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time, stefan.w**At_Symbol_Here**UCONN.EDU writes:

In general, maintenance staff working on rooftop fume hood exhaust equipment have indicated their concerns about being on a roof, and possibly being exposed to whatever is being vented. 

In a more specific laboratory situation, involving MOCVD (metal organic chemical vapor deposition), we have a lock-out tag-out policy, due to the severity of the toxic gases involved.




Does anyone else have MOCVD labs, and to what extent are controls in place for protection of workers on roof tops?
Does anyone else employ a LOTO policy?   
Are roof tops key-accessible only? 

Thanks for the feedback.


-Stefan Wawzyniecki, CIH, CHMM< FONT lang=0 style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" face=Arial color=#000 000 size=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="12" BACK="#ffffff">

University of Connecticut

< /DIV>

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.