Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:36:01 -0800
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "Debbie M. Decker" <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Latex degradation, low humidity,
Chinese drywall? a bit more information
Comments: To: UCIH Program Management Group ,
UC Indoor Air Quality Workgroup ,
Comments: cc: "M. Malendia Maccree"

Thank you all soooo much for your input and ideas.

I think we can safely ru le out Chinese drywall.  This is a one pass air building and there is a tremendous amount of air being hogged out of the building.  It’s been up and operating for about 5 years or so.  The walls are carefull y sealed and painted with an epoxy-type paint so that the walls are easy to clean.  Minimal organic solvents are used – maybe a bit of alcoh ol or acetone and all of that work is accomplished in a fume hood.  There is no ozone producing equipment in this part of the building – no printe rs, copiers, fax machines, “ionizing” air cleaners, etc.  That equipment is in the office area and there aren’t any of these problems there.

But your ideas around ch lorine-type cleaning materials and lighting effects have some promise.  We’r e going to be looking into what type of lighting is installed.  We think they use mostly quarternary ammonium-type cleaners but we’re not completely sure.  We’ll also ask about pesticides but the air sy stem for the research greenhouses is a separate system and those areas don’ ;t seem to have these problems.

Again, thank you for you r input – great discussion!


------------------------ -

From: Debbie < /o:p>

I neglected to include i n my previous post that I thought of ozone first of all, since I have had that i ssue before.  0.02 to 0.03 ppm of ozone was detected in the areas in questi on.

Thanks for your input, s o far.

From: Debbie M. Decker

Please excuse the cross-postings:

I’m working with a group that works in a secured , containment facility.  The supply air is one pass, the exhaust is HEPA filtered and air change rates are in the 10-15 ACH.  Rubber bands, lat ex gloves, the gloves on a glove box, rubber stoppers, etc. degrade very quick ly in this building – a matter of months.  This causes consternatio n among my building occupants – “if latex degrades so quickly, wh at is this building doing to me?”

I have done the following:  datalogged temperatur e, %RH, CO and CO2 twice, at different times of year, for a week.  First set showed extremely low humidity – below 20%rh – all other measurements within customary.  Second round showed %rh in a more norm al range – 35-40%rh.  Magnetic fields were at or below background.  No radioactivity was detected.  The building doesn’t have any weird smells, evidence of mold or water intrusion.  The mechanical system is working as designed, filters in place and without high pressure drop, coils clean, etc., according to my building engineers.< /o:p>

People complain of headaches and stuffy noses, general malaise after working in the building for some period of time.  Someon e has suggested Chinese drywall might be a culprit but I don’t know as it quite fits.

Whaddya think?  All ideas welcome, at this point.




Debbie M. Decker, Campus Chemical Safety Officer
Environmental Health and Safety
University of California, Davis
1 Shields Ave.
Davis, CA  95616
(530)754-7964/(530)752-4527 (FAX)
Co-Conspirator to Make the World A
Better Place -- Visit www.HeroicS and join the conspiracy

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.