Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:32:30 -0700
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Michael Hurwitz <Tesla**At_Symbol_Here**LMI.NET>
Subject: Re: Abbreviations
In-Reply-To: <4ef535571003291330l341dbde5qf15067b90930cfa6**At_Symbol_Here**>

Many of you are totally against abbreviations.  .  . How do you handle compounds where the abbreviation is more known than the name, such as EDTA?  Most people know EDTA by the abbreviation and not the name, Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid.

In our lab we use abbreviations for common compounds with periodic table abbreviation such as NaCl, or KBr.  For chemicals whose names are too long or complex to be practical we use abbreviations and CAS#’s.  Most people in the lab know the abbreviation, but an outsider can at least recognize the and lookup the CAS#.  Since it’s only a few digits, even the longest named compound has a fairly short name name in comparison.  The only issue we have is when we have a chemical which doesn’t have a CAS# yet, but this is rare.


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen A Scott
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:30 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Abbreviations

To Everyone,


What is your opinion of allowing laboratories to use abbreviations and short hand as long as a key to those abbreviations is kept in a conspicuous location and is clearly identified?


Thoughts? and Thanks
Mary Ellen

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.