Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:49:58 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: scrooks**At_Symbol_Here**PPEPPRO.COM
Subject: Re: Question about regulations
In-Reply-To: <692872008F4BD147BEDFE4B917CECDC43E45E1**At_Symbol_Here**>

...on the OSHA side however, any notion that one can simply claim that “it’s R&D” or that “it’s small quantity” and then cite one’s control banding system or the lab standard won’t get you out of issues regarding MSDS development, etc. if sending samples, etc. off-site show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=20390 show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=24782

On a developing note, I suggest keeping an eye on debate and likely promulgation of the updated HazCom Std. as it relates to hazard classification. dsg/hazcom/ghs.html#3.0 cketDetail?R=OSHA-H022K-2006-0062


Steve Crooks, MS, CIH, CSP

People, Property & Environmental Protection, Inc.

12 Reynard Place

Hillsborough, NC 27278


From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Michael Cooper
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:06 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Question about regulations

Karen -

If the violation was based on EPA TSCA rules then the University should be able to claim a R&D exemption - this assumes that the quantity limits are met and the R&D materials would not find their way into commercial use without further evaluation.  On the OSHA side, handling/use issues likewise arise in industrial laboratories doing synthesis work with "new or unknown" chemicals.  There are several schemes patterned after the chemical banding approach (first promulgated in the Pharma industry) to categorize chemicals for handling/use when little information about toxicity has been gathered.  These can be shared - let me know if needed.

With regards,


Michael N. Cooper MS, MPH, CIH

Senior Managing Scientist

Exponent / Failure Analysis Associates

149 Commonwealth Drive

Menlo Park, California  94025


cell (408) 313-2127

office (650) 688-1760


-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**] On Behalf Of Humphrey, Karalyn J.
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 2:14 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Question about regulations


My name is Karen Humphrey and I'm the safety officer for Baylor's Chemistry Department.  I'm trying to sort out the violations we received from an EPA audit that was done recently.  One of the violations that we received was for not having the proper documentation for new chemicals made by our research groups involved with synthesis. 

Do any of you have experience with the documentation required for newly synthesized chemicals?  All of the chemicals are for research and development purposes, and all are in small quantities.  According to the regulations, as I understand them, we have to provide notice of health risks that may be associated with exposure to these newly synthesized chemicals.  But how?  Do we need to generate some kind of MSDS, or is there a labeling system that is used?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Karen Humphrey

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.