| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2013 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Marketing the Conversion to Non-Hg Thermometers Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:13:56 -0500 Author: Jeffrey Lewin |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Marketing the Conversion to Non-Hg Thermometers Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:39:40 -0500 Author: ILPI Support |
Here is link to Stanford’s program.
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/EHS/prod/enviro/Thermometer_replacement.html
Should have a lot of info and FAQs.
Larry
Lawrence M. Gibbs, CIH
Associate Vice Provost for EH&S
Stanford University
480 Oak Road
Stanford, CA 94305-8007
650-723-7403
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Blunk
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 11:46 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Marketing the Conversion to Non-Hg Thermometers
Colleagues,
I’m looking for comparison data / recommendations I might use to assuage academic researcher anxiety with respect to swapping their mercury thermometers for spirit thermometers.
Reluctance to give up Hg thermometers is often rationalized by claiming spirit thermometers aren’t as accurate or aren’t appropriate for as many applications as a mercury-filled thermometer.
I would appreciate suggestions on where I might find performance-based support for spirit-filled thermometers.
I have information regarding comparisons of potential exposure health risk, spill clean-up expense and environmental contamination.
Thanks for your help in finding performance-based support for using spirit filled thermometers rather than mercury filled thermometers,
Dan
---------------------------------
Dan Blunk PhD, REA 831.459.3541
Environmental Programs Manager
Environmental Health & Safety Office
University of California Santa Cruz
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post