Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2014 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2014 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


From: Ralph Stuart <rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Fume Hood Evaluation Form
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:56:14 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 6386178A-C8F0-4BE8-B95B-7657C87908C2**At_Symbol_Here**me.com
In-Reply-To <4F21A5F3A002444D8B4F5E4B767431E537778F3C**At_Symbol_Here**EXMBX2010-7.campus.MCGILL.CA>

Demystify: 

> >Yes, insofar as we would want to identify uses that compromise the hood;s operation, like clutter and or heat or other turbulence-generating activities.
>
At Cornell, we called that a "hood housekeeping score"; criteria for that score are described in the Cornell LVMP.

> >- whether it's operating as designed relative to the general ventilation system in the lab?

> >That would be more difficult to check. I won't pretend that is something we systematically follow up on in my institutions; I'm curious to know what others are doing?

Again at Cornell, the annual fume hood face velocity check also includes a check at the lab door with dry ice to assure that the room was negative to the hallway. This acts as a surrogate for this factor. If negative pressure to the hallway is lost, it's likely that the general ventilation in the room as a whole needs to be assessed.

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart
rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post