From: "Noce, Anthony" <ANoce**At_Symbol_Here**HALEYALDRICH.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] President Obama Signs Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:28:11 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: CY1PR12MB0652E5A3B6EFF07A676ED3B9D3230**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <155945ddee5-7d47-34ff**At_Symbol_Here**>

Please take the time to read about this law. 

While the regulations that will implement the act have not been developed yet, The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act:


=B7         Mandates safety reviews for chemicals in active commerce. It subjects all new and existing chemicals to an EPA safety review.

=B7         Requires EPA to focus on chemicals that are the highest priorities for full risk-based safety assessments.  (Which is where I think some folks are getting confused.  There=E2=80™s a difference between safety reviews and full risk-based safety assessments.)

=B7         Allows industry to request that EPA conduct a safety assessment on a specific chemical.

=B7         Requires a safety finding for new chemicals before they can enter the market.

=B7         Expands EPA's ability to require additional health and safety testing of chemicals.

=B7         Replaces TSCA's cost-benefit safety standard-which prevented EPA from banning asbestos-with a health-based safety standard.

=B7         Explicitly requires protection of vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women.

=B7         Gives EPA enhanced authority to require testing of both new and existing chemicals.

=B7         Sets aggressive, judicially enforceable deadlines for EPA decisions.

=B7         Makes more information about chemicals available, by limiting the ability to claim information as confidential, and by giving states and EHS professionals access to confidential information they need to do their jobs.

=B7         Provides EPA with a full range of options to address the risks of substances including labeling requirements, use restrictions, phase-outs or other appropriate actions

=B7         Promotes cooperation between state and federal regulators while creating a strong national chemical regulatory system, ensuring interstate commerce is not disadvantaged.



Anthony (Tony) Noce

Chair, ACS Committee on Environmental Improvement



Anthony M. Noce, ACSF

Principal Consultant

Operations Risk & Compliance

Haley & Aldrich, Inc.

3 Bedford Farms Drive

Bedford, New Hampshire 03110

+1 (518) 466-5608


-----Original Message-----
From: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>
Sent: Wed, Jun 22, 2016 3:53 pm
Subject: [DCHAS-L] President Obama Signs Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act

President Obama Signs Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act


This morning, President Obama signed into law the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act! This bipartisan effort amends the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - the first major update to an environmental statute in 20 years. At the bottom of this message is the text from EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy's blog on the new law. The link to her blog and tweets from the agency are also included below so feel free to share with your constituents.

Please visit for a copy of the Act, a summary of key provisions, and a Q&A. Additional material, including an Implementation Plan on activities that are required in the first year, will be posted in the coming days.

Next Thursday, June 30, 2016, from 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. EST, EPA will host a webinar to provide an overview of the new Act. This initial webinar will be informational only to help inform those unfamiliar with the new law. We will alert you about additional opportunities for engagement in the coming weeks and post them on our website. To log in to the webinar next week, go to
and sign in as a guest. For audio, please call 866-299-3188, and enter code 2025648098#.

Read Administrator McCarthy's blog - TSCA Reform: A Bipartisan Milestone to Protect Our Health from Dangerous Chemicals

TSCA Reform: A Bipartisan Milestone to Protect Our Health from Dangerous Chemicals

By Gina McCarthy

President Obama just signed a bipartisan bill to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the first major update to an environmental statute in 20 years. 


That=E2=80™s great news for the environment and for the health of all Americans.

TSCA was first passed in 1976 to help keep dangerous chemicals off the market and avoid making people sick. Back then, health experts already knew that certain chemicals could cause very serious health impacts, including cancer, birth defects, and reproductive harm.

While the intent of the original TSCA law was spot-on, it fell far short of giving EPA the authority we needed to get the job done.
It became clear that without major changes to the law, EPA couldn't take the actions necessary to protect people from toxic chemicals. Diverse stakeholders, including industry, retailers, and public health and environmental experts, recognized these deficiencies and began to demand major reforms to the law.

Today, in a culmination of years of effort from both sides of the aisle, President Obama signed a bill that achieves those reforms.

The updated law gives EPA the authorities we need to protect American families from the health effects of dangerous chemicals. I welcome this bipartisan bill as a major step forward to protect Americans' health. And at EPA, we're excited to get to work putting it into action.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (H.R. 2576) was made possible by years of hard work by both Democrats and Republicans in the House and the Senate, as well as EPA staff who have provided significant technical assistance. I applaud everyone who stepped up and made it happen. It's historic, and it'll make Americans' lives better.

TSCA was intended to be one of our nation's foundational environmental laws. In terms of its potential for positive impact, it should have ranked right alongside the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act, which, since the 70's, have dramatically improved water quality and helped clean up 70 percent of our nation's air pollution. But it hasn't.

Forty years after TSCA was enacted, there are still tens of thousands of chemicals on the market that have never been evaluated for safety, because TSCA didn't require it. And the original law set analytical requirements that were nearly impossible to meet, leaving EPA's hands tied - even when the science demanded action on certain chemicals.

The dangers of inaction were never more stark than in the case of asbestos, a chemical known to cause cancer through decades of research.

During the first Bush Administration, EPA tried to ban asbestos under TSCA, but the rule was overturned in court. In the law's 40-year history, only a handful of chemicals have ever been reviewed for health impacts, and only 5 have ever been banned.

Because EPA was not empowered to act on dangerous chemicals, American families were left vulnerable to serious health impacts. At the same time, some states tried to fill the gap to protect their citizens' health=E2=80"but state-by-state rules are no substitute for a strong national program that protects all Americans. Chemical manufacturers, consumer retailers, and others in industry agreed: reform was sorely needed.

As with any major policy reform, this one includes compromises. But the new bipartisan bill is a win for the American people-because it=E2=80™s a victory for EPA's mission to protect public health and the environment.

Here are a few highlights:

The new law requires EPA to evaluate existing chemicals, with clear and enforceable deadlines. Under the old law, the tens of thousands of chemicals already in existence in 1976 were considered in compliance, without any requirement or schedule for EPA to review them for safety.  EPA is now required to systematically prioritize and evaluate chemicals on a specific and enforceable schedule.  Within a few years, EPA's chemicals program will have to assess at least 20 chemicals at a time, beginning another chemical review as soon as one is completed.

Under the new law, EPA will evaluate chemicals purely on the basis of the health risks they pose.  The old law was so burdensome that it prevented EPA from taking action to protect public health and the environment--even when a chemical posed a known health threat.  Now, EPA will have evaluate a chemical's safety purely based on the health risks it poses-including to vulnerable groups like children and the elderly, and to workers who use chemicals daily as part of their jobs-and then take steps to eliminate any unreasonable risks we find.

The new law provides a consistent source of funding for EPA to carry out its new responsibilities.  EPA will now be able to collect up to $25 million a year in user fees from chemical manufacturers and processers, supplemented by Congressional budgeting, to pay for these improvements.

Bottom line: this law is a huge win for public health, and EPA is eager to get to work.


Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.