From: "Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety" <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] New CSB budget proposal
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:27:19 -0400
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: 00D7C33A-C112-4FED-94FB-85BB5AC6C793**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <673A00C44C25834BA3198AADFC1EB7AE8D155DFF**At_Symbol_Here**PIT-MAIL01.uswa-us.local>

>Sadly, it appears that the trade associations -- ACC, SOCMA, API -- and the major companies have remained silent.

I understand that ACS has been interviewed by a variety of publications on the CSB budget issue. I haven't tracked down all of the articles, but the list I have seen includes Bloomberg, Forbes and Chemistry World.

For example, in

‰??It‰??s a vitally important agency that has an outsize impact for a very small budget,‰?? said Glenn Ruskin, communications director for the American Chemical Society, the world‰??s largest scientific society with about 160,000 members. ‰??The safety board is an honest broker at identifying problems, and industry appreciates having that.‰??

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart
Division of Chemical Health and Safety
American Chemical Society

This e-mail is from DCHAS-L, the e-mail list of the ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety.
For more information about the list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.