From: Jack Reidy <jreidy2**At_Symbol_Here**STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (10 articles)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 16:57:14 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: BYAPR02MB568622CA38094C7F8CC453CF8CA60**At_Symbol_Here**BYAPR02MB5686.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
In-Reply-To <1989603256.977568.1588609250263**At_Symbol_Here**mail.yahoo.com>


Monona,

 

I definitely agree on this. Thus far I've come across 4 questions on this subject, all commercial products not on EPA List N. One was a valid disinfectant but just didn't qualify for List N due to having ~10x lower concentrations of quat ammonia than approved compounds. The other 3 were must more suspect, all appealing to chemphobia as the primary part of their marketing ("our product doesn't have chemicals!"). One appeared to be a typical startup just overhyping their untested product. One appeared to actively prey upon pandemic fears: there were a large number of articles about it, but all in highly questionable media outlets, and all appearing in chronological clusters around pandemic events (e.g. Ebola 2014, Zika 2016, ebola hitting the news again in 2019 due to aid worker deaths, and now COVID). The last claimed EPA registration and even had a link on their site, but the link led to ~60 pages copied and pasted from the CFR and a short scanned addendum of an email from the company asking to register with the EPA, and the EPA replying that their product did not qualify for registration (this is just one of the issues I found with this one).

 

Thus far the criteria I've been looking for (and not seeing) with non-List N proposed sterilants is this:

  1. Clear, complete SDS
  2. Reliable data (preferably from a third party tester) showing that it would likely qualify for List N if registered. That is:
    1. Effective against a harder-to-kill pathogen than COVID, or
    2. Effective against pathogens similar to COVID

 

In short, I think we approach any claims of a disinfectant's efficacy now the same we would ordinarily: the parties marketing it have to prove it works.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jack Reidy (he/him)

Research Safety Specialist

Environmental Health & Safety

Stanford University

484 Oak Road, Stanford, CA, 94305

Tel: (650) 497-7614

 

 

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Monona Rossol
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 9:21 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (10 articles)

 

OK, friends, we need to figure out what is going on here, because there are now a flock of "DIY disinffectant" solutions just like there are DIY masks.   The sprayers mostly are ionizers which use electrical current to create some ozone in the water and call it "ionized water."   While bleach is approved, these homemade salt, vinegar, and ionized water combinations are not.  Will this stuff deliver the lipoid damaging punch needed for this virus?    

 

Monona Rossol

 

WACO FIREFIGHTERS PRODUCING DISINFECTANT SOLUTION TO PROTECT FIRST RESPONDERS FROM COVID-19

Tags: us_TX, industrial, discovery, environmental, bleach

 

A mixture of salt and water with a splash of vinegar and a jolt of electrochemical activation is supplying Waco firefighters with a safe but powerful disinfectant as they work to keep their equipment and quarters free of COVID-19.

 

Crews at Waco Fire Station No. 11, where the department's hazardous materials unit is housed, have also developed a new spray system for the disinfectant using their air tanks and other common firehouse equipment. Their formula for homemade hypochlorous acid paired with the spray system lets them kill viruses, bacteria and fungus on gear, trucks and high-use firehouse areas in 60 seconds without the need to wipe everything down afterward.

 

"For lack of a better term, we are the science nerds at Station 11, you know the hazmat crew. Because there is a lot of chemistry that goes into working hazmat calls, we knew we could do something during this time," said Waco fire Lt. Philip Burnett, who works at Station No. 11. "The mixture is basically water, salt and we have to put vinegar in it to lower the pH level to make it neutral, then basically Ôcook' it by putting electricity to it to make the acid with a kill-rate higher than bleach."

 

 

 

Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO

 

Membership chair

American Chemical Society

Division of Chemical Health and Safety

 

---

For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org

Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.