From: Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] OSHA materials on Karen Wetterhahn's mercury exposure
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:06:16 +0000
Reply-To: Monona Rossol <actsnyc**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM>
Message-ID: 2093110143.1809345.1647961576757**At_Symbol_Here**mail.yahoo.com
In-Reply-To


I'd be very interested in anything you find on this, James.  And when the chemical the glove is made from does not also include the mil thickness, that is pretty useless information.  If you doubt this, look at Kimberly Clark's thin mill nitrile charts.  Most of those solvents go through in a minute or two.

Monona


-----Original Message-----
From: James Kaufman <jkaufman**At_Symbol_Here**LABSAFETYINSTITUTE.ORG>
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Sent: Tue, Mar 22, 2022 10:25 am
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] OSHA materials on Karen Wetterhahn's mercury exposure

Can anyone share a copy of the MSDS that was from the actual DMM supplier?  ... Jim
PS.  The CSB video said that MSDS recommended latex gloves.  I have been unable to locate the MSDS.  I did get one from Strem Chemicals from that timeframe but it did not say that.
 James A. Kaufman, PhD
Founder/President Emeritus

The Laboratory Safety Institute (LSI)
A Nonprofit Educational Organization for Safety in Science, Industry, and Education
192 Worcester Street, Natick, MA 01760-2252
(O) 508-647-1900  (F) 508-647-0062  (C) 508-574-6264  Skype: labsafe; 508-401-7406 
jkaufman**At_Symbol_Here**labsafety.org  www.labsafety.org    Teach, Learn, and Practice Science Safely





On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:06 AM Ralph Stuart <ralph**At_Symbol_Here**rstuartcih.org> wrote:
>And wondering about Karen's gloves, were they standard dry-box gloves or did she double glove them inside of the glove-box with another type of glove, as we sometimes double glove with our disposable tactile gloves.

I believe that Dr. Wetterhahn was working in a fume hood rather than a glove box on the occasion of her mercury exposure. I assume that she was using the fume hood to control the fire hazard associated with the dimethyl mercury (flashpoint = 5 degrees C), but the fume hood does not add value with regard to dermal toxicity hazards; and latex gloves add minimial protective value as well. OSHA reports that the dexterity value of the latex gloves led to that choice. I believe that the OSHA presentation on this event suggested that Silvershield gloves were the only appropriate choice at that time.

One of the learning points I take from this story is the challenge of working with chemicals that present multiple hazards while balancing chemical and human factors.

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO
ralph**At_Symbol_Here**rstuartcih.org

---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.