| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2022 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] iron pentacarbonyl Date: Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 8:18:10 AM Author: Ralph Stuart <ralph**At_Symbol_Here**rstuartcih.org> |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] iron pentacarbonyl Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:43:37 -0400 Author: Richard Palluzi |
Here‰??s an interesting twitter thread related to our discussion the challenges of recognizing and managing lab explosion hazards in the chemical literature:
Jeremiah Gassensmith
**At_Symbol_Here**Gassensmith
With reference to https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.9b00914
I'd like to pitch something to **At_Symbol_Here**JOC_OL . Put corrections that involve safety warnings on the downloadable PDF. You really can't warn people enough. Let's take this nice but "corrected" paper. Who wouldn't want an "intrinsically safe" diazo-transfer reagent?
The problem is that this compound turns out to be explosive as a solid and the authors have corrected that here: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.9b00914‰?|.
The compound clearly isn't "intrinsically safe" and considering it explodes the downloadable PDF should be marked.
Again, here's another "stable" and non-explodey diazotranfer reagent: (spoiler: it also explodes as a solid)
Again, a correction‰??the title compound explodes. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ol2007555 ‰?| and again, the PDF doesn't mention it.
Here's my pitch‰??Yes, the website shows a correction, though it doesn't specify that it is safety related. If the consequence of not seeing that correction is blowing a few fingers off then that notice needs to be plastered everywhere *including and especially* the downloaded PDF
---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post