From: "Buczynski, Michael" <Michael.Buczynski**At_Symbol_Here**RB.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] N-100's for nanoparticle formulations.
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:36:03 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 69C62F25-BAE9-4722-A390-091C20E7F03C**At_Symbol_Here**
In-Reply-To <877A5F1406F1C9408F8D6DA88C8492852BB7C55F**At_Symbol_Here**>

One always has to look at the potential exposure and route. If a liquid the amount of the injection material and the potential for inhalation contact is real then yes I would use a N100. Typically I wouldn't think that that would be the case here. Same rule applies if it is a solid with potential for airborne dust. Do an exposure analysis of the job tasks and observe if the inhalation potential exists


On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:12 PM, Wawzyniecki Jr, Stefan <stefan.w**At_Symbol_Here**UCONN.EDU> wrote: