Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2004 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2004 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Capacity for Secondary Containment

Date: Apr 22, 2004 19:37 UTC

Author: Larry D. McLouth <LDMcLouth**At_Symbol_Here**LBL.GOV>

Next by Date

Subject: Looking for Volunteers

Date: Apr 30, 2004 10:14 UTC

Author: Jim Kaufman <Labsafe**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM>

Subject context

From: Dan Blunk <blunk**At_Symbol_Here**UCSC.EDU>

Subject: Re: Capacity for Secondary Containment

Date: Apr 22, 2004 21:42 UTC

Reply-To: Dan Blunk

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
Larry,

 

Our local ordinance for secondary containment for hazardous material
storage (which would include haz waste) states:

1.      The containment material is compatible with the stored material
(it won't be degraded by a spill). 
2.      All materials stored in the same secondary containment are
compatible (they won't chemically react with each other). 
3.      The volume of the secondary containment needs to be 110% of the
volume of a single container or, if there are multiple containers, the
LARGER of either 150% of the largest container volume or 10% of the
total volume of all the containers. 

Dan

---------------------------------

Dan Blunk  PhD, REA  831.459.3541  blunk**At_Symbol_Here**ucsc.edu

Environmental Programs Manager

Environmental Health & Safety Office

University of California Santa Cruz

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of
Larry D. McLouth
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:38 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Capacity for Secondary Containment

 

A number of people have asked what the requirements are for secondary
containment at SAAs.  I have not found a specific "requirement".

 

A guideline I've heard is that secondary containment capacity should be
110% of the largest container or 10% of the aggregate volume of all
containers.

 

What do you use at your facilities?

 

Any thoughts or comments?

 

Thanks

 

Larry

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post