About This Archive | DCHAS-L 2004 Index | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | DCHAS-L Home Page
From: Jim Kaufman <Labsafe**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM>
Subject: Re: Visorgogs
Date: Nov 10, 2004 01:50 UTC
Reply-To: Labsafe**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM
In-Reply-To:
In a message dated 11/9/2004 7:14:20 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mrsafetyman**At_Symbol_Here**juno.com writes:
> The basis of my comment was in response to you advising others that there
> are no marking requirements on safety eye wear. I respectfully disagreed and
> displayed the ansi version which identifies required markings.
> Richard Rydza, MS; OSH
Unfortunately and respectfully, Richard is mistaken. I did not say this and
I gave no such advice. Not even close.
What I said was "It (Z-87.1) does not require the manufacturer to mark the
device to distinguish the proper use." Big difference.
The marking does not tell you which device is appropriate for which
activity/hazard. It would be much more helpful if the ANSI Z-87.1 standard recommended
the placement of the device letter from the selection chart after the Z-87.1
mark.
I also noted "It does not require the manufacture to obtain independent
third-part verification that the criteria of the standard had been met (as
does the
Z-358.1 standard for eyewash and safety shower)."
Anyone disagree? ... Jim
************************************
James A. Kaufman, Ph.D.
President/CEO
The Laboratory Safety Institute
Safety in Science and Science Education
192 Worcester Road, Natick, MA 01760
508-647-1900 Fax: 508-647-0062 Cell: 508-574-6264
Email: jimkaufman**At_Symbol_Here**labsafety.org
Web Site: http://www.labsafety.org
*************************************