DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
Previous by Date:
Subject: Re: Low Cost Respirator
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:12:02 -0600
Author: Bob Peck
|
|
Next by Date:
Subject: DCHAS-L update
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 12:14:42 -0500
Author: Ralph Stuart
|
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:30:33 -0800
Reply-To: Sheila Kennedy <smk**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.UCSD.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Sheila Kennedy <smk**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.UCSD.EDU>
Subject: undergraduate lab safety - blue sky ideas
Comments: To: LABSAFETY-L Discussion List
,
"Wong, Brenda" , Justin Turner ,
Ken Jacoby , "Snow, Richard" ,
Spring Straum ,
Doug Harvey ,
"Ian J. Ball" ,
DaFei Feng ,
Haim Weizman ,
Sergio Guazzotti ,
Robert Ternansky ,
Chris White ,
Robert Continetti , theinl**At_Symbol_Here**sandiego.edu
Comments: cc: "Palmer, John" ,
Barbara Sawrey ,
Suzanne Anderson ,
Peter Wotruba ,
Marijana Vukovic ,
Vilma Chua ,
Carmen Susana Jones ,
"Stephen A. Smith" ,
Thomas Butler , Rebecca Hwa
Apologies up front to those who read receive this by more than one route.
I'm working on an idea to expand our undergraduate chem lab safety
training and, as always, I'd appreciate any ideas - particularly of
those who might consider employing our students in the future. Nothing
is happening with this immediately, so blue-sky thinking is encouraged.
Please circulate the query to anyone you think may have good suggestions.
We've been working on the assumption that different people learn
differently - no news to anyone who teaches. Our lab safety materials
and lab rules are available in a variety of formats: a student can
attend a lecture, read a study guide with practice test questions, or
contact the lab staff for information, clarification, etc., but it's all
very much centered on reading. One route we haven't pursued is a
hands-on set-up for those who learn by doing (or at least by seeing
things done first hand). (Please don't tell me these are University
students and they're supposed to be able to learn by reading - that's
another argument.)
I'm imagining a lab set up with various areas, using common lab
equipment: a balance area, a gc operating area, a distillation set-up,
a titration set-up, a dispensing area with materials in various forms, a
hazardous waste collection area . . . . Each station would be designed
to illustrate a correct procedure, while giving the teacher a chance to
point out pitfalls and false assumptions ("your might think it would be
easier to . . . ., but we've learned that it doesn't work well because.
. . .) In some of my imaginings, this is a bingo-type game, where the
student needs to find a certain pattern of items to fill out a card . .
. (possibly to get a small prize??)
I do realize that in the best situation, each TA in each lab would be
doing something like this, but it isn't happening. If we can do
something like this, it might be an inspiration to some of our TAs.
Have you done something like this? Will you share your experience?
What lab situations would be most valuable?
What pitfall should we particularly highlight?
What positive aspects of lab practice should be strongly emphasized?
Is it worth the additional time involved to make it a game, rather than
a demonstration?
Teachers: How much time can students spend at something like this before
their eyes glaze over?
Teachers: What are the other pitfalls of this kind of teaching/presentation?
Many thanks to you all, Sheila
--
Sheila M. Kennedy
Safety Coordinator
Undergraduate Teaching Laboratories
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Dr. #0303
La Jolla, CA 92093-0303
(858) 534-0221
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post