Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2006 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2006 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Alternatives to Steam

Date: Apr 7, 2006 12:15 UTC

Author: List Moderator <esf**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Spill kit portable vs. fixed

Date: Apr 7, 2006 13:38 UTC

Author: List Moderator <esf**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

Subject context

From: List Moderator <esf**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

Subject: Re: Spill kit portable vs. fixed

Date: Apr 7, 2006 13:09 UTC

Reply-To: List Moderator

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
From: "Paul Harrison" 
Date: April 7, 2006 9:07:49 AM EDT
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Spill kit portable vs. fixed

I don't have a lot of experience with HF, but should point out, as a
chemist, first that there is NO WAY that fluorine gas could be evolved
from HF; just think about your level I redox chemistry.  Second, I
would imagine that calcium carbonate or hydroxide is a good idea
because CaF2 is insoluble in the water that would be used for clean-up
(it is the natural rock form of fluorine: fluorite, as I recall).

Using sodium carbonate would generate NaF which by contrast is
water-soluble, and thus harder to dispose.  Presumably, another feature
of calcium salts is that the excess spill agent is also
water-insoluble, as opposed to sodium salts.

Best,
Paul Harrison

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post