Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2006 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2006 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Chemical Lists

Date: Sep 29, 2006 18:18 UTC

Author: Russ Phifer <rphifer**At_Symbol_Here**GLASMESH.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Chemical Lists

Date: Sep 30, 2006 01:46 UTC

Author: DAVID KATZ <dakatz45**At_Symbol_Here**MSN.COM>

From: Gary M. Kehoe <GKehoe**At_Symbol_Here**MWGEN.COM>

Subject: Confined Space Rescue

Date: Sep 29, 2006 22:58 UTC

Reply-To: "Gary M. Kehoe"

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
I was having a discussion with a colleague the other day about confined 
space entry and non-entry rescue.  My understanding of the OSHA standard 
was that all permit required CS entries (non-IDLH)  had to be done with a 
harness and method to initiate non-entry rescue UNLESS the harness and/or 
retrieval system presents a greater hazard.  My colleague basically agreed 
except he held a caveat that if the employer chooses not to perform 
non-entry rescues, a harness and retrieval system is not required and 
reliance on an on-site or off-site rescue service is acceptable as long as 
they can fulfill meet the "timely" response requirements.   I also vaguely 
recall OSHA specifying the hierarchy of rescue as being 1) self-rescue, 2) 
non-entry rescue, 3) entry rescue although I can't find that written 
anywhere.  Anyone know that source?. 

Opinions?  Isn't it weird what some people will talk about over lunch?  I 
think I scared my intern this summer with IH geeky discussions like this.

Gary M. Kehoe, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Midwest Generation EMG
312-583-6103
312-925-1813 (C)
312-788-5533 (F)

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post