DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive
Previous by Date:
Subject: Hg vapor detection
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:45:09 -0700
Author: Russell Vernon
|
|
Next by Date:
Subject: Re: Hg vapor detection
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:35:03 -0500
Author: Diane Amell
|
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:05:55 -0700
Reply-To: Gordon Miller <miller22**At_Symbol_Here**LLNL.GOV>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Gordon Miller <miller22**At_Symbol_Here**LLNL.GOV>
Subject: Re: Hg vapor detection
In-Reply-To: <773854B2E1C0D94687157C3B57F07FDC02DF65B1**At_Symbol_Here**VCAMAIL.vcadmin.vcaitad.ucr.edu>
The Bacharach MV-2 was withdrawn from the market. It was the best for
hunting down spilled mercury, perhaps the leading reason for using a
mercury sniffer, because the response time was close enough to real
time. If anyone else offers a uv spectrophotometric mercury
instrument, they'll make a killing in the market!
>Dear DivCHAS Members,
>
>
>
>Other than the Jerome 431X and the Reliable Instruments MVA-1 what, if
>any portable mercury vapor analyzers might you be able to recommend?
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Russ
>
>Russell Vernon, Ph.D.
>UC System-wide Field Safety Working Group Chair
>http://ehs55.ehs.uci.edu/fieldsafe/index.jsp
>
>Laboratory / Research Safety Specialist & Integrated Waste Manager
>Environmental Health & Safety
>University of California, Riverside
>900 University Ave.
>Riverside, CA 92521
>
>russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**ucr.edu
>www.ehs.ucr.edu
>
>Direct: (951) 827-5119
>Admin: (951) 827-5528
>Fax: (951) 827-5122
>
>
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post
