Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2007 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2007 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Lab Safety Policies for Individuals with Disabilities

Date: Aug 8, 2007 12:55 UTC

Author: Jim Kaufman <Labsafe**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Lab Safety Policies for Individuals with Disabilities

Date: Aug 10, 2007 19:36 UTC

Author: Russell Vernon <russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**UCR.EDU>

From: Don Wanamaker <dwanamaker**At_Symbol_Here**EMLWEB.COM>

Subject: Question for R. Stuart

Date: Aug 8, 2007 14:33 UTC

Reply-To: Don Wanamaker

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
I have an issue with possible sulfur interference in connection with analytical Method 1664 A (SGT-HEM), determining non-polar material (NPM). Yellow crystals form in some of our samples. It is not clear if the crystals are a result of acidification (as required by the Method) of samples containing certain sulfur compounds (like ammonium thiosulfate), or from some other source. I know that the final residue (which is weighed as NPM) is a yellow powder that contains elemental sulfur. Does anyone have information about sulfur and NPM analysis, or a modification to Method 1664 A when there may be sulfur interference?  I'd appreciate any help you can give me.

Thank you,
Don Wanamaker
American Chemical Society Member #01158318
Environmental Management, Ltd.
845-429-1141

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post