Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2007 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2007 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Carbon Monoxide Detector

Date: Aug 15, 2007 12:43 UTC

Author: Dan Crowl <crowl**At_Symbol_Here**MTU.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: ANTHRAX, LABORATORY EXPOSURE - USA (MISSISSIPPI)

Date: Aug 19, 2007 16:08 UTC

Author: List Moderator <ecgrants**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

Subject context

From: Gordon Miller <miller22**At_Symbol_Here**LLNL.GOV>

Subject: Re: Carbon Monoxide Detector

Date: Aug 15, 2007 14:32 UTC

Reply-To: <46C2DCB0.50801**At_Symbol_Here**verizon.net>

In-Reply-To: <46C2DCB0.50801**At_Symbol_Here**verizon.net>

Demystify: 
The electrochemical gas detectors are not entirely interference free 
so sulfuric acid mist or SO2 may have simulated CO. I never saw it 
around batteries, but NOx interfered with the old Ecolyzers (the 
original electrochemical gas instrument) while CO interfered with the 
Enolyzer (a follow on for NOx from the same manufacturer).

Maybe the battery got hot enough to cook organics enough to create CO.

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post