Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2008 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2008 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Safety Shower/eyewash

Date: Jan 31, 2008 16:33 UTC

Author: Latimer, Lee <lee.latimer**At_Symbol_Here**ELAN.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Safety Shower/eyewash - drains vs no drains

Date: Jan 31, 2008 16:54 UTC

Author: Alan Hall <ahalltoxic**At_Symbol_Here**MSN.COM>

From: Neil Edwards <Neil.Edwards**At_Symbol_Here**LIU.EDU>

Subject: Re: Safety Shower/eyewash question

Date: Jan 31, 2008 16:44 UTC

Reply-To: A

In-Reply-To: A

Demystify: 

To Jenny Tsang, re eyewash/showers: I do not believe there are regulations requiring drains. Our facility has them; I know others that do not. Nevertheless, I believe it is much better to have them. Adding a drain system obviously costs more money. It also has the potential to create an environmental problem, i.e., that of hazardous material going into the drain, and possibly ending up in the water supply or the soil, unless your drains go to an on-site water treatment facility. That being said, however, the lack of drains tends to reduce the frequency of testing the showers (since cleanup can be very inconvenient). Even worse, if a situation arises in which there is an emergency requiring use of the shower, the resulting flood of water can spread the contamination all around the lab, and create a serious slip-and-fall hazard for the victim and others. If there was broken glassware involved in the incident, there could then be even greater injury. Neil Edwards Laboratory Manager Department of Chemistry Long Island University - C. W. Post Campus 516-299-2017 voice 516-299-3944 fax nedwards**At_Symbol_Here**liu.edu

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post