Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2009 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2009 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: OU Employee Charged With Arson In Chemistry Building

Date: Nov 20, 2009 13:37 UTC

Author: List Moderator <ecgrants**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall?

Date: Nov 20, 2009 14:25 UTC

Author: Ray Ryan <RRyan**At_Symbol_Here**FLOWSCIENCES.COM>

Subject context

From: Ken Simolo <simolo**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.CHEM.ROCHESTER.EDU>

Subject: OU Employee Charged With Arson In Chemistry Building

Date: Nov 20, 2009 13:37 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List

In-Reply-To: <8ea708400911191444u2283107ftd5ba8422fe8112d2**At_Symbol_Here**mail.gmail.com>

Demystify: 

Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:25:04 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Ken Simolo <simolo**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.CHEM.ROCHESTER.EDU>
Subject: Re: Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall?
In-Reply-To: <8ea708400911191444u2283107ftd5ba8422fe8112d2**At_Symbol_Here**mail.gmail.com>

I have noticed in boxes that have been left around for extended periods 
of time that only those near the opening have degraded.  The more 
exposed they were, the more degraded they were.

Ken

On Nov 19, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Carol Lentz wrote:

> Not necessarily, I noticed over the years that latex gloves exposed to 
only fluorescent lights in labs without windows degraded faster than 
gloves kept in lab drawers. But I only observed it, I didn't do any 
testing to verify it.

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post