Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2010 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2010 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Laboratory medical oversight, re:cyanides

Date: Mar 18, 2010 14:47 UTC

Author: Alan Fredrick <AFredrick**At_Symbol_Here**DISCDYN.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Evaporating HW

Date: Mar 18, 2010 19:52 UTC

Author: List Moderator <ecgrants**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

From: List Moderator <ecgrants**At_Symbol_Here**UVM.EDU>

Subject: Re: Waste Evaporation

Date: Mar 18, 2010 18:56 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>

Message-ID: <legacy-2010-20100318f@ilpi.com>

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

From: Bradley Randall Grams <bgrams**At_Symbol_Here**gmail.com>
Date: March 18, 2010 2:50:24 PM EDT


Hi:

 

Generally speaking, evaporation from a fume hood for purposes of disposal is treatment (by evaporation) of hazardous waste without a permit, and is a violation of U.S. EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery and Clean Air Acts (RCRA and CAA, respectively), respectively.  It is also technically a violation of the State's respective RCRA and CAA equivalent programs.

 

While I understand that it is likely de minimis amounts of chemical, it is against the law, and the laws for very small generators of hazardous waste are extremely minimal (e.g., your municipal waste haulers in many cases have programs for you to dispose of such wastes, whether in industry or as a household). 

 

Finally, please note, that as such behavior seeks to avoid Federal, State, and potentially local, statutes and regulations, it may be considered a criminal act in your State.

 

Thanks!

 

Cheers,

 

Brad




Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post