Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2011 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2011 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Chemical Safety Headlines From Google (13 articles)

Date: Jul 1, 2011 12:23 UTC

Author: "Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety"

Next by Date

Subject: Re: When is non-water fire suppression required in a chemical

Date: Jul 1, 2011 16:46 UTC

Author: Rob Toreki <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>

Subject context

From: Ferm Barret A <FermBarretA**At_Symbol_Here**SAU.EDU>

Subject: Chemical Safety Headlines From Google (13 articles)

Date: Jul 1, 2011 12:23 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List

In-Reply-To: <DCHAS-L%201107010000340731.000D**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>

Demystify: 

Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:08:25 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Ferm Barret A <FermBarretA**At_Symbol_Here**SAU.EDU>
Subject: When is non-water fire suppression required in a chemical
stockroom?
In-Reply-To: <DCHAS-L%201107010000340731.000D**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
We are in the design phase of creating a new, modest-size chemical
stockroom, which is considered an occupied space.  Is it current
standard to have fire suppression that uses a non-aqueous agent?  Does
it depend on what chemicals are present?  It will definitely house
general organics, acids and flammables.  Is there a prevailing design
philosophy I can present to the decision-makers?

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post