Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2011 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2011 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Chemical Safety Headlines From Google (11 articles)

Date: Sep 21, 2011 13:12 UTC

Author: Ralph Stuart <rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**ME.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Fume Hoods

Date: Sep 21, 2011 15:20 UTC

Author: Don Abramowitz <dabramow**At_Symbol_Here**BRYNMAWR.EDU>

Subject context

From: Michael Hojjatie <mhojjatie**At_Symbol_Here**TKINET.COM>

Subject: Fume Hoods

Date: Sep 21, 2011 15:07 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:07:56 -0700
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Michael Hojjatie <mhojjatie**At_Symbol_Here**TKINET.COM>
Subject: Fume Hoods

Dear coll eagues:

< /span>

We are in the process of building a new Laboratory and contemplating between using Dustless Fume Hoods vs. Ducted Exhaust Hoods. W e will be using a variety of hazardous chemicals including carbon disulfide , acetonitrile, toluene, benzene, some carcinogenic suspect chemicals, hydr ogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide gases.

I ap preciate sharing your experiences with ductless fume hoods and whether you recommend these type of hoods for hazardous chemical work using the aforeme ntioned chemical examples as well as advantages and disadvantages of these hoods vs. the ducted exhaust hoods (safety concerns, costs, maintenance, et c.)

Thanks,

 

Michael Hojjatie, Ph.D.

R&D director, TKI

   

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post