About This Archive | DCHAS-L 2011 Index | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | DCHAS-L Home Page
From: Mike Hurwitz <tesla**At_Symbol_Here**LMI.NET>
Subject: Re: 4% hydrogen mixture
Date: Sep 22, 2011 23:04 UTC
Reply-To:
DCHAS-L Discussion List
In-Reply-To: <4E7B1BA9020000BA000322CB**At_Symbol_Here**gwsmtp1.smith.edu>
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Ooops forgot, for the paint ball ones, we usually have to cut off the chunk of plastic covering the mouth. -Mike > > Hi, > > I have a researcher wants to work with one of the nastier acute toxins and > is pushing back against wearing safety goggles (our requirement when > working with acute toxins, among others) because "within 5 minutes of > wearing them, they fog up". We are currently using the "Revolution" > goggle with Visiclear antifog coating (from Jackson Safety)...I haven't > heard anyone else complain, but maybe this researcher has a really high > body temperature normally, or just sweats a lot, who knows? > > If you can recommend a different goggle--and I'd be willing to pay $25-40 > for a pair if they WOULD NOT FOG--I would be very interested. I am > thinking that facilities handling Select Agents and/or manufacturing > facilities handling acute toxins have people in these for a good couple of > hours at a time. I don't need to know what your 'nasty' is--but I am very > interested in hearing from anyone at commercial facilities as well as > academic. > > Many thanks to all- > Margaret >