Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2011 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2011 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: Glove chart that lists sodium azide?

Date: Dec 1, 2011 13:53 UTC

Author: ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM

Next by Date

Subject: Re: Fume Hood

Date: Dec 1, 2011 16:02 UTC

Author: Don Abramowitz <dabramow**At_Symbol_Here**BRYNMAWR.EDU>

Subject context

From: Mary Ellen A Scott <mas35**At_Symbol_Here**CASE.EDU>

Subject: Re: Glove chart that lists sodium azide?

Date: Dec 1, 2011 13:53 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:29:57 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu>
From: Mary Ellen A Scott <mas35**At_Symbol_Here**CASE.EDU>
Subject: Fume Hood
X-To: DCHAS-L <dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu>

Hello Everyone,

When the utility panel on a chemical fume hood is missing is it safe to allow work to be preformed in the hood?

I would say work (synthesis, toxic gas use and powder decanting) should not be preformed until the panel be replaced for the following reasons:

1. Eddyies in the hood are likely to be form which may cause loss of containment.
2. Chemicals vapors are going into areas where they are not suppose go and may cause deterioration of the plumbing and joints
3. HighPerformance and Low flow hoods would be especially vulnerable to the loss of work space integrity.

Would anyone have a policy on hood repairs like the above or comments?
As always, thank you for your thoughts in advance.

Mary Ellen



Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post