Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2012 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2012 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


DCHAS-L Archives ยท Post dated June 27, 2012

Re: [DCHAS-L] High performance hoods

Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] High performance hoods

Date: Jun 27, 2012 10:28 UTC

Author: Peter Zavon <pzavon**At_Symbol_Here**ROCHESTER.RR.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Safe Nano Workshop

Date: Jun 27, 2012 10:58 UTC

Author: Geraci, Charles L. (Chuck) (CDC/NIOSH/EID) <ciu9**At_Symbol_Here**CDC.GOV>

Subject context

From: Ralph B Stuart <rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**CORNELL.EDU>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] High performance hoods

Date: Jun 27, 2012 10:47 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L &lt;DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU&gt;

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
Does anyone have experience with such hoods and have they found them to be acceptable for use with common solvents. Are there any downsides to their use?

I have seen demonstrations of them that indicate that they work as well as more traditional hoods in terms of containment. Aerodynamically, there's nothing particularly magic about 100 fpm, so I believe that a well designed hood should be able to provide the same protection at 80 fpm and don't forsee any operational downsides. Some jurisdictions have regulators who need to be convinced of this, though.

Maybe someone with more direct experience of the lower flow hoods knows of other challenges they present?

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart CIH
Laboratory Ventilation Specialist
Department of Environmental Health and Safety
Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post