Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2012 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2012 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Safe Nano Workshop

Date: Jun 27, 2012 10:58 UTC

Author: Geraci, Charles L. (Chuck) (CDC/NIOSH/EID) <ciu9**At_Symbol_Here**CDC.GOV>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] chemical receiving

Date: Jun 28, 2012 03:16 UTC

Author: Leslie Coop <lbcoop**At_Symbol_Here**UALR.EDU>

Subject context

From: ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Toxic dust handling

Date: Jun 28, 2012 02:47 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Ken,  I wondered when this question would come up.  There used to be a 10 mg/m3 TLV-TWA for silica gel, but it was withdrawn for lack of data.  And now, based on studies of very fine (respirable) inert particles in general, I would treat the stuff as potentially hazardous.  So I for one, was glad to see this discussion rather than to have people plan no precautions because technically only the SiO2 contaminant is regulated.

If it is any help, NIOSH has a 6 mg/m3 REL-TWA for silica gel itself and the DFG MAK-TWA for two amorphous silica forms diatomaceous earth and fused silica in respirable size particles is 0.3 mg/m3.  As for the SiO2 contaminant, it has a MAK 1 rating, meaning employers must use every available technology to keep exposure to this cancer-causing stuff as close to zero as possible.  They don't set exposure standards for MAK 1 carcinogens since they understand that the decision on just where to set the workplace limit is literally a discussion about how many workers it is acceptable to do in.

I think I see a TLV coming down the pike from ACGIH in the future.

Monona


In a message dated 6/28/2012 8:27:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, kwkretch**At_Symbol_Here**NCSU.EDU writes:


I think this is a very useful discussion.  I'm curious about the original mention of silica gel which started this thread.  For those of you who may handle this material in bulk, is this silica gel (amorphous silica) expected to be contaminated with crystalline silica which is the toxicity concern ?
 
thanks
Ken

Director, Environmental Health and Safety
NC State University
Raleigh, NC 27695-8007
919-515-6860


Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post