Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2012 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2012 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


From: ACTSNYC**At_Symbol_Here**CS.COM
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Housekeeping chemical "Natural Mineral"
Date: December 9, 2012 11:01:38 AM EST
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: <570b.7fd14c0c.3df60fe1**At_Symbol_Here**cs.com>

Demystify: 

Who writes/reviews their MSDSs?   Isn't it their job to keep up?   And it doesn't matter if it is biologically available or not.  The issue on the MSDS is it's presence.  And when they develop products like airbrush makeup or spray paints, shouldn't  they be researching inhalation route hazards?  If it is not a lie, it is gross negligence.  Monona

In a message dated 12/9/2012 8:58:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, pzavon**At_Symbol_Here**ROCHESTER.RR.COM writes:

Not necessarily a lie.  The IARC listing TiO2 as a carcinogen as not come to the attention of more than just you.  Sometimes repackagers and even manufacturers don't know (or believe that their application makes it biologically unavailable), and sometimes you will find outdated documents on the internet, even after the manufacturer has replaced them.





Peter Zavon, CIH
Penfield, NY




Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post