Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2013 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2013 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] 6 Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

Date: Jun 26, 2013 10:10 UTC

Author: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] New CPSC Data Shows 60% of All Fireworks Injuries Occur Around July 4th;

Date: Jun 27, 2013 07:25 UTC

Author: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

From: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] 4 more Re: Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

Date: Jun 26, 2013 11:46 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
Date: June 26, 2013 11:08:35 AM EDT
To: DCHAS-L


How about referring to them by a descriptive title: injured researcher, coworker, PI, postdoc, technician, etc.

===
From:
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology
Date: June 26, 2013 10:21:49 AM EDT

The term "subject" has generally been used.


-Kevin

*********************************************************
Kevin J. Beltis
Director of Health, Safety and Environment
TIAX LLC

Office: 781.879.1222
FAX: 781.879.1202
Mobile: 508.934.9382
Address:
35 Hartwell Avenue
Lexington, MA 02421-3102

TIAX, "Powered by Innovation"

*******************************************************

TIAX, LLC is a privately held company at the intersection of business and technology. TIAX builds on a rich heritage based on creating business opportunities and growth through the power of science, technology, and innovation.

===
From: Ernie Lippert
Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] 6 Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology
Date: June 26, 2013 11:10:37 AM EDT

I agree with Al - he makes sense. Any other word would be contrived and, as
such, would not be universally accepted. "Person(s) involved" seems to cover
most possibilities.

Regards,
Ernie Lippert

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post