Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2013 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2013 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


DCHAS-L Archives ยท Post dated June 26, 2013

Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Laser lab design - Vibration concerns

Date: Jun 26, 2013 04:12 UTC

Author: Leogane Olivier <o.leogane**At_Symbol_Here**UMONTREAL.CA>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (17 articles)

Date: Jun 26, 2013 07:53 UTC

Author: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Subject context

From: Alnajjar

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

Date: Jun 26, 2013 05:44 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L &lt;DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU&gt;

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
Ralph:

Below are our thoughts from this end of the world:

It depends on the context in which we use terms for "people involved" in an incident. We are not sure a specific label is needed, other than what the person (he/she) is normally called at the lab, such as chemist, lab technician, postdoc, principal investigator, project manager, janitor, SME, etc. We don't think it's necessary to label people according to their involvement in an incident. They're not victims, perpetrators or even participants who should be branded. Incidents can happen to anyone and people should be known by their normal title. If we need to make general statements, we can use words like "staff member," or "employee" or simply "person." For anyone who was not involved but at the scene, we could say "nearby staff member," or "technician in the next lab," etc. We avoid using the terms "bystander" or "onlooker."

Hope this helps ... Mikhail

-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Ralph B. Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:32 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Help with terminology

As part of our incident review process, we are developing a "lessons learned" review process designed to encapsulate key points of either prevention or response to lab incidents that may apply in other laboratory settings on campus. An ongoing challenge I've faced is what to call the person who is more directly involved in the incident. Sometimes they are hurt as a consequence of the incident, sometimes not, but calling them the "victim" seems to prejudice the questions we want to ask about the event. Have other people come up with terms to describe the people who are at the scene of an incident and may or may not be involved in the cause of the incident?

Thanks for any help with this.

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post