Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2013 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2013 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage

Date: Jul 24, 2013 13:11 UTC

Author: Ralph B. Stuart <rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**CORNELL.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage

Date: Jul 24, 2013 13:38 UTC

Author: Casparian, Armen <caspariana**At_Symbol_Here**WIT.EDU>

From: Mary M. Cavanaugh <cavanaughmm**At_Symbol_Here**APPSTATE.EDU>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] DCHAS-L Digest - 22 Jul 2013 to 23 Jul 2013 (#2013-163)

Date: Jul 24, 2013 13:30 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 
We're in the process of rolling out GHS training to our lab groups and one of the questions that arose is whether GHS hazard classes can be used as guidance for chemical storage compatibility groups. I can't think of any reason why not off the top of my head, but I thought I would ask the DCHAS-L list if you've run into any examples of GHS icons putting chemicals in the wrong storage class. Have you?

Thanks for any help with this.

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:00:28 -0400
From: Nicole Wilb
Subject: Re: GHS and chemical storage

Hello Ralph,

The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids and bases.
So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these products are not compatible.

Sincerely,

Nicole


*Nicole Wilb*, Ph.D.

Chemical Safety Officer

EH&S

*UniversitĚŠ de Sherbrooke*

Phone : (819) 821-8000 ext. 62084

Email : Nicole.Wilb**At_Symbol_Here**USherbrooke.ca

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Ralph B. Stuart wrote:

> We're in the process of rolling out GHS training to our lab groups and
> one of the questions that arose is whether GHS hazard classes can be
> used as guidance for chemical storage compatibility groups. I can't
> think of any reason why not off the top of my head, but I thought I
> would ask the DCHAS-L list if you've run into any examples of GHS
> icons putting chemicals in the wrong storage class. Have you?
>
> Thanks for any help with this.
>
> - Ralph
>
>
> Ralph Stuart CIH
> Chemical Hygiene Officer
> Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University
>
> rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu
>

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:29:37 +0000
From: "Ralph B. Stuart"
Subject: Re: GHS and chemical storage

> The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids and bases. So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these products are not compatible.

Good point; I thought of that after I sent the e-mail. I wonder if there are other examples of incompatibilities within GHS classes (for example, explosives?).

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:16 -0400
From: Margaret Rakas
Subject: Re: GHS and chemical storage

Well, then there's the flammable symbol... 70% ethanol is going to be flammable, still, but isn't pyrophoric. In an organic chem lab, I would store pyrophorics separately from 70% ethanol, but the GHS symbol is the same...


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ralph B. Stuart wrote:

> > The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids
> and bases. So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these
> products are not compatible.****
>
> ** **
>
> Good point; I thought of that after I sent the e-mail. I wonder if
> there are other examples of incompatibilities within GHS classes (for
> example,
> explosives?).****
>
> ** **
>
> - Ralph****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Ralph Stuart CIH****
>
> Chemical Hygiene Officer****
>
> Department of Environmental Health and Safety****
>
> Cornell University****
>
> ** **
>
> rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu****
>
> ** **
>

--
Margaret A. Rakas, Ph.D.
Manager, Inventory & Regulatory Affairs
Clark Science Center
413-585-3877 (p)

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:57:37 -0700
From: "Herriott, Carole"
Subject: Re: GHS and chemical storage

What about multiple symbols? Which take precedence?
-C


Carole Herriott
EH&S Technician - Hazardous Waste Coordinator Weyerhaeuser Technology Center

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Margaret Rakas
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:38 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage

Well, then there's the flammable symbol... 70% ethanol is going to be flammable, still, but isn't pyrophoric. In an organic chem lab, I would store pyrophorics separately from 70% ethanol, but the GHS symbol is the same...

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ralph B. Stuart > wrote:
> The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids and bases. So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these products are not compatible.

Good point; I thought of that after I sent the e-mail. I wonder if there are other examples of incompatibilities within GHS classes (for example, explosives?).

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu


--
Margaret A. Rakas, Ph.D.
Manager, Inventory & Regulatory Affairs
Clark Science Center
413-585-3877 (p)

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:32:00 -0700
From: Kevin Creed
Subject: Re: GHS and chemical storage

Hi Ralph,

Also . under 'acutely toxic (Severe)' you could get incompatibles, e.g., cyanide salts and concentrated nitric acid.

Also under the corrosive you have oxidizing acids and organic acids as incompatible.

Kevin

Kevin Creed

Manager, ChemTracker Program

Stanford University

EH&S

480 Oak Road

Stanford, CA 94305-8007

office: 650-723-4767

cell: 408-529-0724

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Ralph B. Stuart
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:30 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage

> The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids and
bases. So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these products are not compatible.

Good point; I thought of that after I sent the e-mail. I wonder if there are other examples of incompatibilities within GHS classes (for example, explosives?).

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart CIH

Chemical Hygiene Officer

Department of Environmental Health and Safety

Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:52:50 -0500
From: "Bradley, Shelly"
Subject: What we do is important!!!!

Sorry for the double posting. I forgot to change the Subject line.

I just thought I would pass this along to my safety colleagues around the country.

A former student and his mother came by campus today. He is on a long road to recovery from severe injuries in an industrial accident. He wanted me to know that the safety training he received here saved his life.

Never doubt that what we do is important!!

Shelly Bradley
NRCC-CHO
Authorized OSHA Trainer
Instrumentation Specialist
Laboratory Development Assistant
Campus Chemical Compliance Director
Department of Chemistry
Hendrix College
Conway, AR 72032
(501) 450-3812
bradley**At_Symbol_Here**hendrix.edu

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:27:09 -0400
From: Bruce Van Scoy
Subject: Re: GHS and chemical storage

Ralph,

I have not had the chance to really review the issue yet. I would like to request list members to provide any and all examples of incompatible storage issues that they are aware of under GHS.

I would like to add these bullets to the training to be provided shortly
that is due before December. Since I have not seen anything equivalent or
similar on the "official" pages, the list may be a great place to start the discussion.

BruceV

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin Creed
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 4:32 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage

Hi Ralph,

Also . under 'acutely toxic (Severe)' you could get incompatibles, e.g., cyanide salts and concentrated nitric acid.

Also under the corrosive you have oxidizing acids and organic acids as incompatible.

Kevin

Kevin Creed

Manager, ChemTracker Program

Stanford University

EH&S

480 Oak Road

Stanford, CA 94305-8007

office: 650-723-4767

cell: 408-529-0724

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Ralph B. Stuart
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:30 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] GHS and chemical storage

> The only problem is for the corrosive class, that contains acids and
bases. So you can not rely completely on GHS for storage, as these products are not compatible.

Good point; I thought of that after I sent the e-mail. I wonder if there are other examples of incompatibilities within GHS classes (for example, explosives?).

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart CIH

Chemical Hygiene Officer

Department of Environmental Health and Safety

Cornell University

rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

------------------------------

End of DCHAS-L Digest - 22 Jul 2013 to 23 Jul 2013 (#2013-163)
**************************************************************

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post