About This Archive | DCHAS-L 2013 Index | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | DCHAS-L Home Page
Here is link to Stanford’s program.  
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/EHS/prod/enviro/Thermometer_replacement.html
Should have a lot of info and FAQs.
Larry
Lawrence M. Gibbs, CIH
Associate Vice Provost for EH&S
Stanford University
480 Oak Road
Stanford, CA  94305-8007
650-723-7403
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Blunk
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 11:46 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Marketing the Conversion to Non-Hg Thermometers
Colleagues,
I’m looking for comparison data / recommendations I might use to assuage academic researcher anxiety with respect to swapping their mercury thermometers for spirit thermometers.
Reluctance to give up Hg thermometers is often rationalized by claiming spirit thermometers aren’t as accurate or aren’t appropriate for as many applications as a mercury-filled thermometer.
I would appreciate suggestions on where I might find performance-based support for spirit-filled thermometers.
I have information regarding comparisons of potential exposure health risk, spill clean-up expense and environmental contamination.
Thanks for your help in finding performance-based support for using spirit filled thermometers rather than mercury filled thermometers,
Dan
---------------------------------
Dan Blunk  PhD, REA  831.459.3541  
Environmental Programs Manager
Environmental Health & Safety Office
University of California Santa Cruz