Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2014 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2014 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Sources for follow up on Harran settlement

Date: Jun 21, 2014 21:48 UTC

Author: Brooks, Walter <skoorb62**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Nature article on Harran settlement

Date: Jun 22, 2014 21:42 UTC

Author: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Subject context

From: Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Rainbow Demonstration - New and Improved!

Date: Jun 22, 2014 12:34 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Someone sent me this reminder off list:

Getting rid of strontium waste can be a real hassle. We had Sr, Th, and U in our multi-element ICP-MS standards, and we were required to list every element that was in the waste container, which was a 90 day waste container in our situation. The waste company rejected the load and we had to scramble to work within a closing 90 day window (90 day waste) to find another facility. The problem was the disposal company simply didn?t care these were natural isotopes despite all the documentation we sent them; they were on a list of rad waste they were not permitted to treat for and we were stuck out of luck.

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post