Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2014 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2014 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Use of fire resistant lab coat

Date: Jul 18, 2014 16:36 UTC

Author: Ken Simolo <simolo**At_Symbol_Here**CHEM.CHEM.ROCHESTER.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Use of fire resistant lab coat

Date: Jul 18, 2014 17:11 UTC

Author: Kennedy, Sheila <s1kennedy**At_Symbol_Here**ucsd.edu>

Subject context

From: Ray Cook <raycook**At_Symbol_Here**APEXHSE.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Use of fire resistant lab coat

Date: Jul 18, 2014 17:00 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Nomex is inherently flame resistent.

Cheers!

Ray Cook, CIH, CSP
ApexHSE.com
832-477-4454

I Cor 1:18
Sent from my iPhone


> On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Ken Simolo wrote:
>
> Some have concerns regarding the health impacts of some of the chemicals used to provide the fire resistance.
>
> Ken
>
>
>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Ralph B. Stuart wrote:
>>
>> A question I'm wondering about as we as a professional community consider the aftermath of the UCLA lab fire and its legal follow up is whether there is a reason beyond finances to not use fire resistant lab coats in the lab setting. I recognize that both the initial and maintenance costs associated with fire resistant coats are significantly higher than alternatives, but I wonder if there are other disadvantages associated with their use.
>>
>> Thanks for any information about this.
>>
>> - Ralph
>>
>> Ralph Stuart, CIH CCHO
>> Chemical Hygiene Officer
>> Department of Environmental Health and Safety
>> Cornell University
>> Ithaca, NY 14850
>>
>> rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu
>

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post