Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2014 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2014 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


From: Ralph Stuart <rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Colorado methanol fire case
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:17:20 -0400
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 06776886-6210-4C02-81B8-506F61389105**At_Symbol_Here**me.com
In-Reply-To <8D1BF2E3C97EF4C-1E88-1322D**At_Symbol_Here**webmail-va083.sysops.aol.com>

Demystify: 

>In my opinion, those who urge others to â?? use common senseâ?? are saying things equivalent to â??be more carefulâ?? as a future action in an accident investigation.

I think that it also assumes an "information deficit" model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_deficit_model
to explain behavior. I believe that the scientific communication researchers are finding that that is not a good explanation for public behavior, particularly around chemicals. There is an element of technical explanation that has to include cultural factors as well in order to be effective.

I wonder if one reason that the number of methanol fires is gaining notice is that there are a lot of "cool" demonstrations by amateurs on the web that science teachers feel that they have to emulate or compete with? Personally, I'm not clear that fires and explosions are the best way to explain chemistry, but I know that it is a popular approach with some educators.

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart
rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post