Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2014 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2014 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Fwd: [DCHAS-L] [DCHAS-L] GHS query-markers

Date: Nov 20, 2014 02:42 UTC

Author: Bradley Tice <beowulfgrendel**At_Symbol_Here**ICLOUD.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Fume Hood Evaluation Form

Date: Nov 20, 2014 13:48 UTC

Author: Wayne Wood <wayne.wood**At_Symbol_Here**MCGILL.CA>

Subject context

From: Ralph Stuart <rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Fume Hood Evaluation Form

Date: Nov 20, 2014 11:56 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

> >Yes, insofar as we would want to identify uses that compromise the hood;s operation, like clutter and or heat or other turbulence-generating activities.
>
At Cornell, we called that a "hood housekeeping score"; criteria for that score are described in the Cornell LVMP.

> >- whether it's operating as designed relative to the general ventilation system in the lab?

> >That would be more difficult to check. I won't pretend that is something we systematically follow up on in my institutions; I'm curious to know what others are doing?

Again at Cornell, the annual fume hood face velocity check also includes a check at the lab door with dry ice to assure that the room was negative to the hallway. This acts as a surrogate for this factor. If negative pressure to the hallway is lost, it's likely that the general ventilation in the room as a whole needs to be assessed.

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart
rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post