Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2015 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2015 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Earthquake Drills in the Lab

Date: Oct 13, 2015 22:19 UTC

Author: Melissa Anderson <mwanderson08**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Thomas Jefferson's fume hoods

Date: Oct 13, 2015 22:43 UTC

Author: Debbie M. Decker <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU>

Subject context

From: Debbie M. Decker <dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**UCDAVIS.EDU>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Lab Waste accumulation bottle preference

Date: Oct 13, 2015 22:37 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Upon request, EH&S/Haz Waste Management Group, provides 2.5 and 5 gallon carboys for waste collection.  These carboys have a large (2.5"?) opening on the top for the addition of waste.  If an individual lab doesn't generate enough to fill a carboy within the regulatory accumulation period, the labs typically use recycled/reclaimed 4 liter glass bottles for waste collection.  EH&S doesn't provide the 4 liter bottles.

 

Hope this helps,

Debbie

 

Debbie M. Decker, CCHO, ACS Fellow

Chair, Division of Chemical Health and Safety

University of California, Davis

(530)754-7964

(530)304-6728

dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu

 

Birkett's hypothesis: "Any chemical reaction

that proceeds smoothly under normal conditions,

can proceed violently in the presence of an idiot."

 


_________________________________________________________________________

----- Original Message -----

From:Stuart, Ralph

To:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU

Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 8:00 AM

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Lab Waste accumulation bottle preference

 

I'm getting ready to order some waste accumulation bottles for our laboratories and wonder if there is a practical reason to have narrow mouth bottles rather than wide mouth bottles. It seems like the wide mouth bottles would eliminate the need for a funnel during the filling process and lead to less exterior contamination of the waste bottle. However, standard practice appears to be narrow mouth bottles and I wonder if this is due to a specific practical reason or inertia?

Thanks for any thoughts on this.

- Ralph


Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Keene State College

ralph.stuart**At_Symbol_Here**keene.edu

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post