Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2016 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2016 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Systemic safety problems?

Date: May 1, 2016 13:46 UTC

Author: K Roy <safesci**At_Symbol_Here**SBCGLOBAL.NET>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Simple benchmarking scale for safety

Date: May 1, 2016 14:58 UTC

Author: Stuart, Ralph <Ralph.Stuart**At_Symbol_Here**keene.edu>

Subject context

From: Daniel Crowl <crowl**At_Symbol_Here**MTU.EDU>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Simple benchmarking scale for safety

Date: May 1, 2016 14:09 UTC

Reply-To: DCHAS-L

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

=E2=80=8BWith all these lab incidents there has been a lot of discussion about what to do. One thing that is missing is a simple benchmarking scale to gauge your safety program.

Last July I was at a process safety workshop in Hong Kong and saw a presentation by Hugh Sullivan of ERM - a consulting firm. He presented a scale that works for all safety programs, including lab safety and process safety. I took the liberty of adding a 0 on the scale because, sadly, I have encountered this many times.

The benchmarking scale is:

0 - no safety program, maybe even disdain for safety.
1 - reacts to accidents only
2 - follows rules and regulations
3 - management systems exist such as hazard analysis, pre-startup reviews, etc.
4 - performance indicators - including leading and lagging
5 - adapting - safety is a core value

Several comments:

a. you need to work your way up thru the scale - you can't jump from 2 to 5
b. many folks think that following all rules and regulations is adequate. Sorry, but that only gets you to a 2.

Dan Crowl
Adjunct Professor, University of Utah
Professor Emeritus, Michigan Tech University

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post