Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2017 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2017 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Career Change Question

Date: Dec 7, 2017 13:36 UTC

Author: Wilhelm, Monique <mwilhelm**At_Symbol_Here**UMFLINT.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] ? re Lead Acetate

Date: Dec 7, 2017 14:23 UTC

Author: Harry J. Elston <helston**At_Symbol_Here**MIDWESTCHEMSAFETY.COM>

Subject context

From: Tadeusz Wysocki Jr. <tswysocki**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] ? re Lead Acetate

Date: Dec 7, 2017 13:53 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Lead acetate crystals ( aka sugar of lead ) if used in, and prepared in an approved hood,
following best laboratory practices should limit exposure within regulator limits.

There is more risk in skin, and ingestion route of entry than from inhalation.

In the past in was part of lead acetate used to make "white lead" for lead based paints.

Ancient Romans had recipies using sugar of lead in cooking.
Hope this helps,

Ted.


On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Wilhelm, Monique <mwilhelm**At_Symbol_Here**umflint.edu> wrote:

Hello Everyone,

Need an expert opinion here. One of my faculty was told by someone that she needs to use a full facepiece respirator to work with lead acetate. I definitely understand the risks associated with lead, especially as a powder. However, I am very confident in our hood function and her using the hood properly. If she is doing her weighing in the hood, would lead acetate still warrant the use of a respirator? Or, would I have to prove that we are keeping the exposure limits to zero to have her not use one?

Sigma's SDS Info on the compound:

Ventilation System:
A system of local and/or general exhaust is recommended to keep employee exposures below the Airborne Exposure Limits. Local exhaust ventilation is generally preferred because it can control the emissions of the contaminant at its source, preventing dispersion of it into the general work area. Please refer to the ACGIH document, Industrial Ventilation, A Manual of Recommended Practices, most recent edition, for details.


Personal Respirators (NIOSH Approved):
If the exposure limit is exceeded, a half-face high efficiency dust/mist respirator may be worn for up to ten times the exposure limit or the maximum use concentration specified by the appropriate regulatory agency or respirator supplier, whichever is lowest. A full-face piece high efficiency dust/mist respirator may be worn up to 50 times the exposure limit, or the maximum use concentration specified by the appropriate regulatory agency or respirator supplier, whichever is lowest. For emergencies or instances where the exposure levels are not known, use a full-facepiece positive-pressure, air-supplied respirator. WARNING: Air-purifying respirators do not protect workers in oxygen-deficient atmospheres.

Thank you for all of your wisdom.

Monique

_________________________________________________________

Monique Wilhelm, M.S., NRCC Certified CHO

ACS D-CHAS Secretary-Elect|2017 CERM E. Ann Nalley Award Recipient

Laboratory Manager|Adjunct Lecturer|Chemistry Club Advisor

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry|University of Michigan-Flint

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post