Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2018 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2018 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] 3 more messages RE: [DCHAS-L] Thoughts on some arguments against drains under safety showers

Date: Oct 4, 2018 11:47 UTC

Author: DCHAS Membership Chair <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Papers on risks of scaling up reactions

Date: Oct 4, 2018 16:16 UTC

Author: Frankie Wood-Black <fwoodblack90**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Thread context

From: Margaret Rakas <mrakas**At_Symbol_Here**SMITH.EDU>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Annual Certification Parameters for Fume Hoods w/Face Velocity Reduced to 80 fpm...

Date: Oct 4, 2018 14:27 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

Good morning,

For those of you who have worked with an industrial hygiene or engineering company involved with sustainability efforts which include adjusting laboratory ventilation, when you have had fume hoods originally set to average 100 fpm face velocity reset to average 80 fpm face velocity, what was your 'fail' point when recertifying? (These are 'standard', not "high performance" fume hoods.)

The original ANSI standard considered any average values between 80-120 a "pass"; obviously while we'd prefer to never deviate downward, there is likely going to be some hood, somewhere whose average reading is somewhat less than 80. I guess I can 'live with' a 5% deviation, but what about a 10%? If you accepted "70" for example, as passing, did you verify that with an ASHRAE 110 smoke test? Or ??? Yes, I know I can go back to the consultants but I have a ton of respect for the technical and real-world knowledge of this group.

I realize that face velocity is just one measure of containment, that capture of vapors depends on a number of factors, etc, and our consultants did perform the ASHRAE 110 tests on several hoods at 80 fpm before all similar ones were set to 80 fpm...I am looking for real-world advice dealing with what I have to work with...

many thanks
Margaret


--
Margaret A. Rakas, Ph.D.
Manager, Inventory & Regulatory Affairs
Clark Science Center
413-585-3877 (p)

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post