Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2018 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2018 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Charges Dropped Against UCLA Professor In Deadly Lab Fire

Date: Oct 5, 2018 19:03 UTC

Author: Denise Beautreau <deb313**At_Symbol_Here**LEHIGH.EDU>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Thoughts on some arguments against drains under safety showers

Date: Oct 6, 2018 07:43 UTC

Author: Michael Ahler <mahler**At_Symbol_Here**HANCOCKCOLLEGE.EDU>

Thread context

From: Monona Rossol <0000030664c37427-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Charges Dropped Against UCLA Professor In Deadly Lab Fire

Date: Oct 6, 2018 02:04 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Charges Dropped Against UCLA Professor In Deadly Lab Fire

Demystify: 

They were properly charged.  But only one was properly sentenced.  Professor Harran's $10.000 fine and 800 hours of community service, some of it served in a burn hospital, was poetically just.  But the fat cat Board of regents coughing up $500,000 for a scholarship fund and the deferred sentence agreement that read just like the Lab Standard they should have been enforcing all long, was not anywhere near what it should have been.  There should also have been progress reports required that would monitor their establishment and enforcement of this program and a training schedule which would include Professor Harran who also clearly didn't know as much as he should have.  And how about the Trustees actually get training on what their occupational safety legal obligations are under the law.  

And I make them take and pass a quiz.
.  

Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President:  Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012     212-777-0062

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Mike <mwright**At_Symbol_Here**USW.ORG>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Sent: Fri, Oct 5, 2018 2:18 pm
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Charges Dropped Against UCLA Professor In Deadly Lab Fire

My colleagues and I have investigated more than a thousand fatal and catastrophic accidents, mostly in the manufacturing and extractive industries, including some in industrial labs. We also represent staff and faculty is several universities and colleges, so we are familiar with the safety issues in academic labs. Paul is right that the facts of each case are unique, and the matrix of causes and contributing factors is complex. However, the assignment of responsibility is far more simple. Employers are responsible for ensuring a safe workplace. Period. That means identifying the hazards; ensuring that those hazards are addressed through adequate controls including, but not limited to, supplying PPE; and providing suitable training that goes beyond mere procedures and conveys a deep understanding of safety. The responsibility is the same whether it's the University of California or ExxonMobil. It's true whether the employee is a chemical worker or a graduate assistant. Professor Harran and the Regents failed to live up to their responsibilities. They were properly charged.   
 
Further, it's accurate but misleading to say that the charges were dismissed.  The charges were due to be dismissed if Prof. Harran completed the steps required by the plea agreement. To his credit, he did so early. The judge then fulfilled the State's part of the agreement. That in no way exonerates Prof. Harran or the University.  
 
Our own investigations are about causation and prevention, not guilt. We believe in accountability, and we support civil and criminal penalties where they are appropriate - as I would argue they are here. But that's not our goal. The real issue is how we prevent such tragedies in the future. And from what I seen, academic labs have a ways to go. I don't know any industrial lab director who would claim that he or she is not responsible for safety. PIs are equally responsible.  We won't make progress where they don't acknowledge it.
 
Mike Wright
 
Michael J. Wright
Director of Health, Safety and Environment
United Steelworkers
 
412-562-2580 office
412-370-0105 cell
 
"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we=E2=80™ll change the world."
                                                                                                                                                                                         Jack Layton
 
 
 
 
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU] On Behalf Of Harrison, Paul
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 12:16 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Charges Dropped Against UCLA Professor In Deadly Lab Fire
 
Oh, if only it were so simple!  Why do more and more people seem to believe that things are black or white?  This tragedy has been investigated so thoroughly BECAUSE it is a very complex and unique situation.  The result is not "right" or "wrong" but the sum of multiple considerations.  It is overly simplistic to say that "PIs are always responsible" or to state that they should never be.  The next event will be different (and hopefully less tragic) but there will be a whole new set of considerations, another set of lawyers.... and so it goes.  We can either study each event in depth and with consideration of all the arguments, or just hope that others will do so, but I do not buy that we can or should weigh in with unconsidered generalizations.
 
Paul