Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2019 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2019 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] PNNL Hydrogen Fire Event Video

Date: Jan 29, 2019 15:15 UTC

Author: Richard Palluzi <rpalluzi**At_Symbol_Here**VERIZON.NET>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] PNNL Hydrogen Fire Event Video

Date: Jan 29, 2019 16:36 UTC

Author: Ken Kretchman <kwkretch**At_Symbol_Here**ncsu.edu>

Thread context

From: Eugene Ngai <eugene_ngai**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] PNNL Hydrogen Fire Event Video

Date: Jan 29, 2019 15:37 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] PNNL Hydrogen Fire Event Video

Demystify: 

What Ken is referring to are RFO (Restrictive Flow Orifices), these were designed in the 1980's to be installed in the cylinder valve outlet. Initially a 0.010" was used to prevent silane from being released without immediate ignition. It continues to be used today for cylinders of silane. To comply with the Fire Code requirements for worst case releases, many users use a 0.006" RFO for highly toxic gases such as arsine or phosphine to reduce the size of the abatement system. There are many other sizes available. Ken's boss David Rainer wrote an excellent AIHA article on the origin and use of RFO's. If you want a copy please e-mail me

 

In addition lecture bottles (LB) have lecture bottle valves and CGA connections 160 or 170). These cannot have RFO's inserted. Lecture bottles that have standard cylinder valves and PRDs are called 7X cylinders. These can have RFO's inserted

 

Eugene Ngai

Chemically Speaking LLC

www.chemicallyspeakingllc.com

 

 

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Richard Palluzi
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:16 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] PNNL Hydrogen Fire Event Video

 

You need to be very careful as the flow limiting orifice supplied in most commercial cylinders, while limiting vs. a fully open valve, still allows an awful large flow which is more than usually required for research purposes. Installing a custom sized flow limiting restrictive orifice (available from Swagelok among others) is usually more prudent.

 

Richard Palluzi

PE, CSP

 

Pilot plant and laboratory consulting, safety, design,reviews, and training

Linkedin Profile

 

Richard P Palluzi LLC

72 Summit Drive

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

rpalluzi**At_Symbol_Here**verizon.net

908-285-3782

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Ken Kretchman
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 8:31 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] PNNL Hydrogen Fire Event Video

 

Depending on flow rates required..obtaining flammable and/or toxic gas cylinders with flow limiting orifices is also a good practice.

 

Ken

 

 

Ken Kretchman, CIH, CSP   Director, Environmental Health and Safety

NC State University / Box 8007 / 2620 Wolf Village Way / Raleigh North Carolina 27695-8007

Email: Ken_Kretchman**At_Symbol_Here**ncsu.edu / Phone: (919).515.6860 / Fax: (919).515.6307

 

 

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:10 PM jeskiekb**At_Symbol_Here**comcast.net <jeskiekb**At_Symbol_Here**comcast.net> wrote:

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post