Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2019 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2019 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Update for Membership on the Journal of Chemical Health and Safety

Date: Feb 24, 2019 17:33 UTC

Author: Samuella Sigmann <sigmannsb**At_Symbol_Here**appstate.edu>

Next by Date

Subject: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (4 articles)

Date: Feb 25, 2019 12:33 UTC

Author: DCHAS Membership Chair <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Thread context

From: Alan Hall <oldeddoc**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Scientist says some pollution is good for you — a disputed claim Trump’s EPA has embraced

Date: Feb 24, 2019 22:21 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] Scientist says some pollution is good for you Ñ a disputed claim TrumpÕs EPA has embraced

Demystify: 
Et al,

Having been rather lll and in the hospital all last week, this is the first I've seen of this.

Pollution good for you?

What kind of idiotic, moronic nonsense are we up to now?  Bringing to environmental regulatory science and public health clearly discredited principles that used to constitute homeopathic medicine?

As to politics, I am a medium conservative republican who didn't like either choice for President last time around and so chose the one I though was least awful.

Climate change is clearly real.  What is not clear is how much anthropogenic activities contribute to it or if it was going to happen anyway (as it has many times in the past)..

A book on the econmoincs of climate change I reviewed for a journal a few years ago lead me to the conclusions that we can no longer afford all of us in terms of a sustainable environment, and that whether or not anthropogenic activites contribute significantly to climate change or not, what's wrong with having clean air to breath, clean water to drink, and sa afe and adequate food supply, etc., etc. etc.

Are there "safe" levels of pollutant exposure?  Quite difficu;t to say.  There are levels below which we are currently not able to detect adverse effects, but that doesn't mean with long-term and usually multiple complex mixture exposures that they clearly do not exist.  Public health should whenever possible err on the side of being to conservative rather than the "let the breather beware" lassez-faire approach.

Maybe I'll cogitate on this some more later when I'm more up to par, but this approach to me seems sheer lunacy.

Alan
Alan H. Hall, M.D.
Medical Toxicologist
Clinical Asistant Professor
Colrado School of Public Health
University of Colorado-Denver



On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:28 AM TILAK CHANDRA <0000058f112ac338-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**lists.princeton.edu> wrote:

Thank you Rob!


To verify the actual toxicity of various pollutants/particulates, we need to have the data on human clinical trials, not on other species. According to recent UNO report, 4.2 million deaths occur each year due to air pollution. Also, how we are going to measure low and high pollution.

 

This will be a good puzzle for Dr. Alan Hall, a toxicologist to interpret reported toxicological data published in peer review journals about some pollution is good for humans.

 

Tilak


From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> on behalf of ILPI Support <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:03:40 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Scientist says some pollution is good for you — a disputed claim Trump’s EPA has embraced
 
The title of this LA Times article speaks for itself.  Interesting to hear what “mainstream” toxicologists have to say on this.


Rob Toreki

 ======================================================
Safety Emporium - Lab & Safety Supplies featuring brand names
you know and trust.  Visit us at http://www.SafetyEmporium.com
esales**At_Symbol_Here**safetyemporium.com  or toll-free: (866) 326-5412
Fax: (856) 553-6154, PO Box 1003, Blackwood, NJ 08012




--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter @acsdchas

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post