Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2019 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2019 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Request for the community guidance and input

Date: Jun 25, 2019 16:12 UTC

Author: NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Compressed gases and sparking electronics

Date: Jun 25, 2019 17:16 UTC

Author: Richard Palluzi <000006c59248530b-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>

From: DCHAS Membership Chair <membership**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>

Subject: [DCHAS-L] [New post] When does a reduction in injury numbers become statistically significant?

Date: Jun 25, 2019 16:24 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To:  

Demystify: 

From: Safety Differently <donotreply**At_Symbol_Here**wordpress.com>
Subject: [New post] When does a reduction in injury numbers become statistically significant?
Date: June 25, 2019 at 11:07:41 AM GMT-4
New post on Safety Differently
When does a reduction in injury numbers become statistically significant?

By Dr. Marloes Nitert and Dr. Sidney Dekker 

Those who've been around safety (and particularly safety differently) long enough, know that LTI (Lost Time Injuries) is a lousy safety measure. LTI, after all, was once instituted as a productivity measure, not a safety measure. But LTI is actually quite a silly measure too. This blog shows just how silly it gets, and how foolish (or statistically meaningless) any claims about LTI reduction really are. 

more at ...

http://www.safetydifferently.com/when-does-a-reduction-in-injury-numbers-become-statistically-significant/


Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post