Safety Emporium eyewashes
Safety Emporium eyewashes

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated

DCHAS-L Discussion List Archive

About This Archive  |   DCHAS-L 2019 Index   |   DCHAS-L Yearly Index   |   DCHAS-L Home Page

About This Archive

DCHAS-L 2019 Index

DCHAS-L Yearly Index

DCHAS-L Home Page


Previous by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS and label software

Date: Jul 13, 2019 00:31 UTC

Author: Dan Nowlan <dnowlan**At_Symbol_Here**BERRYMANPRODUCTS.COM>

Next by Date

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS and label software

Date: Jul 13, 2019 02:45 UTC

Author: Michael <mabuczynski**At_Symbol_Here**HOTMAIL.COM>

Thread context

From: Peter Zavon <pzavon**At_Symbol_Here**rochester.rr.com>

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS and label software

Date: Jul 13, 2019 02:07 UTC

Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety

In-Reply-To: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS and label software

Demystify: 

I agree with both Dan and Kathryn.

 

WERCS is very flexible and will accommodate most languages.  They can customize translations using a translation table so your special wording can be used, not just the boiler plate they provide.  But it requires some intense training to use effectively and, as of the last time I had access (some 3 years ago), it is not easy to use especially if all your SDS are not precisely suitable for the general template you put together.  It does let you set up to meet US and EU, and other, formatting requirements separately if you want – just create another template.

 

On the other hand it is very structured, so limiting precise adjustments for specific circumstances without lots of effort.

 

It is also not cheap.

 

 

Peter Zavon, CIH
Penfield, NY

PZAVON**At_Symbol_Here**Rochester.rr.com

 

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Nowlan
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 8:32 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS and label software

 

I suspect I'll get little sympathy from this group but as a formulator, I absolutely HATE using Wercs. Not only is it cumbersome to navigate, but I feel like nobody outside the company needs to know ALL our secret weapons if they are not posing health risks not otherwise represented by another ingredient. If I'm using non-haz components (by design!), that should be my business. Glycerine? PG? GMO? Who cares. They shot me down just the other day for not disclosing 50 ppm amylene in a 60% methylene chloride formula. Seriously?!

  

Dan

  

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

  

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Kathryn Strang <00000813eb1d48e7-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>

Date: 7/12/19 6:24 PM (GMT-06:00)

To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU

Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] SDS and label software

 

Neal

UL's The WERCS software dies GHS SDS in approximately 70 languages.  It can also do labels.  We used it for many years in my company.  I am retired but they are still using it.

Kitty Strang

 

Previous post  |  Top of Page  |  Next post